Editorial

Editorial Policy

Understand how Scroll Wallet writes, reviews, updates, and labels wallet education and crypto research content.

Updated May 2, 20266 min read

Reader intent first

Articles should answer the wallet, chain, token, or recovery question that brought the reader to the page.

Source-backed claims

Product, security, fee, and regulatory claims should be checked against primary documentation or clearly identified market context.

Useful updates

When wallet details change, the page should be updated with practical context rather than vague disclaimers.

Editorial purpose

Scroll Wallet publishes wallet guides, recovery explainers, network support pages, and market context for users who need practical self-custody information. Content should help readers understand wallet choices, operational risks, and security habits without presenting speculative claims as certainty.

We prioritize plain language, clear limitations, and explicit risk context. A guide may compare wallets or workflows, but it should not instruct readers to buy a token, take leverage, bypass compliance controls, or share wallet secrets.

Research and review standards

Wallet content is reviewed for custody model, recovery design, network support, security language, fee context, and the practical steps a reader can verify before using a wallet or dApp.

Primary references are preferred for product claims, including wallet documentation, protocol documentation, public help centers, app store pages, open-source repositories, and official security notes.

  • Separate verified product facts from opinion or market interpretation.
  • Label custody, exchange, bridge, and smart-contract risks clearly.
  • Avoid promising recovery, profit, regulatory certainty, or universal safety.
  • Update time-sensitive details when fees, supported networks, or wallet policies change.

Content updates

Wallet software, network fees, supported chains, and regulatory treatment can change quickly. Pages should be refreshed when those changes affect a reader's decision or safety checklist.

Reader feedback is reviewed when it points to outdated wallet details, broken links, unclear risk language, or missing context that could affect self-custody decisions.

Independence

Editorial decisions should not be controlled by advertisers, affiliates, or token issuers. If a commercial relationship affects a link or placement, the relationship should be disclosed clearly on the page or through the affiliate disclosure policy.

Authors and editors should avoid claiming official endorsement by a wallet, exchange, foundation, or protocol unless that relationship is documented and current.